24 songs cost her $1.92-million

June 20th, 2009

edited from Toronto’s Globe and Mail

Is a digital copy of Green Day’s classic pop-punk song “Basket Case” worth $80,000 U.S.?

That’s what Jammie Thomas-Rasset may very well end up paying for each of the 24 songs she shared on the online file-sharing service Kazaa, as the result of a landmark ruling yesterday.

A federal jury in Minnesota found the 32-year-old single mother of four guilty of copyright infringement and ordered her to pay $1.92-million (U.S.) – or $80,000 a song – in statutory damages to the record companies that brought the lawsuit against her.

“There’s no way they’re ever going to get that,” Ms. Thomas-Rasset said after the verdict. “I’m a mom, limited means, so I’m not going to worry about it now.”

This is the second time Ms. Thomas-Rasset has had a jury verdict go against her in this case, the first instance of a file-sharing lawsuit going to trial in the United States. A different federal jury also found her guilty in 2007 and rendered a $222,000 judgment.

Although the Recording Industry Association of America – the trade organization that represents the largest music labels in the United States – said it has stopped launching new lawsuits against individual file sharers, the organization said it would be willing to settle the suits it has already filed and continues to pursue out of court, including Ms. Thomas-Rasset’s case.

“When the facts are presented to juries on these issues, they take this issue seriously and appreciate the real harm that’s done to the music community,” the RIAA said in a e-mail.

“Remember, it was a jury of regular folks who rendered this decision. We do not seek any specific damage awards. For the few existing cases, this verdict is a reminder of the clarity of the law.”

Although Ms. Thomas-Rasset has not yet decided whether she will appeal the verdict, some legal analysts say she may be able to challenge the jury’s decision on constitutional grounds.

Fred von Lohmann, senior staff lawyer for the advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that financial penalties in civil cases can not be “grossly excessive” or be used as deterrents.

“If the recording industry lawyer said that you need to send a message in order to get all of those other file sharers to stop or to compensate us for all the harm that they’ve done to our business, then they might have crossed the line,” he said.

Canadian Government ready to lean on ISPs

June 18th, 2009
Edited from the Toronto Globe & Mail
Police will have sweeping new powers to collect information about Canadian Internet users without a warrant, and activate tracking devices in their cellphones and cars under legislation proposed by the Conservative government yesterday and criticized by privacy advocates as excessive.

The government’s latest shot at introducing “lawful access” legislation will force Internet service providers to install monitoring technology on their servers to keep track of their users’ online activities.

Two bills – the Investigative Powers for the 21st Century Act and the Technical Assistance for Law Enforcement in the 21st Century Act – were introduced just before the House of Commons empties out until the fall session.

Critics point out that the onus is on law enforcement agencies to explain why they need these new powers.“Nobody wants to create roadblocks for law enforcement, but there has been no evidence put forward that the current system has created any barriers, and I think it raises real concern where there is potential for abuse,” said Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa who holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and e-commerce law. “That’s why you have court oversight.”

Mr. Geist noted that some major police investigations in the past few years – including the arrest of 18 Toronto-area terrorism suspects in 2006 – was very much dependent on the Internet, and progressed even under current legislation.

In 2007, public safety minister Stockwell Day said the government would not force ISPs to hand over personal information about their users to police without a warrant. Yesterday, though, the government proposed exactly that.

The proposed legislation appears to have at least one loophole. Because the cost of installing tracking technology is so high, large ISPs will be required to do it, but smaller service providers will get three years to comply fully. Therefore, for years to come, some ISPs will be able to monitor their customers’ activities and some won’t.A Bell spokesperson said that the company has a long history of working with law enforcement agencies, but added that the government should recognize the unique and disproportionate burden and responsibility placed on the telecom sector as a subset of the larger business community, and that the costs of policing shouldn’t be shifted entirely to one industry.

While the legislation is targeted at “traditional” crime/terrorism, the legislation could extend to gathering data around illegal downloading of copyright material i.e. music and video.

Better late than never - IBM sees the mobility light

June 17th, 2009

IBM has decided that it wants to become influential in the world of mobile computing.

The company has announced a $100 million investment pool to develop new services for mobile phones. With few details about its research goals, IBM indicated that improved mobile payment methods, security, privacy, and user interface are points of focus, along enhancing the ability of corporations to use mobile devices for improved interaction with customers and employees.

IBM is a bit behind venture capitalists, mobile phone manufacturers and carriers who have already created big pools of research and investment money for the mobile space. With more and more feature-rich smart phones giving users easier access to the Internet and content, IBM has picked up on the trend that the personal computer no longer the center of the action.

Sweden’s Pirate Party wins European Seat

June 9th, 2009

From Reuters
Sweden’s Pirate Party has won a seat in the European Parliament, capturing 7.1 per cent of votes in Sweden in the Europe-wide ballot, enough to give it a single seat. The party wants to deregulate copyright, abolish the patent system and reduce surveillance on the Internet.

“This is fantastic” Christian Engstrom, the party’s top candidate, told Reuters. “This shows that there are a lot of people who think that personal integrity is important and that it matters that we deal with the Internet and the new information society in the right way.”

Previously an obscure group of single-issue activists, the party enjoyed a jump in popularity after the conviction in April of four men behind The Pirate Bay, one of the world’s biggest free file-sharing website. The defendants have called for a retrial.

Despite the similar names, the party and the website are not linked. The party was founded in 2006 and contested a Swedish general election that year, but received less than one per cent of the vote.

Mr. Engstrom credited the party’s appeal to young voters for its success. “We are very strong among those under 30. They are the ones who understand the new world the best. And they have now signalled they don’t like how the big parties deal with these issues.”

The Pirate Party will take up one of Sweden’s 18 seats in the 785-seat parliament. “We will use all of our strength to defend personal integrity and our civil rights,” Mr. Engstrom said.

Sony opens Older Catalogue to eMusic

June 1st, 2009

Sony Music Entertainment has agreed to make its back catalog of songs available on eMusic, one of the largest music retailers on the Web.

eMusic has some 400,000 subscribers who pay a monthly fee to download a certain number of songs. Its service is primarily aimed at adults who are fans of music from independent labels. Songs are in the MP3 format and do not have restrictions against copying.

The company will add all Sony Music tracks that are more than two years old, including material from artists like Michael Jackson, Bruce Springsteen and Billy Joel.

As part of the deal, eMusic says it will slightly raise prices and reduce the number of downloads for some of its monthly plans.

Danny Stein, eMusic’s chief executive, has been talking to the major labels about adding their music for several years. Talks continue with Warner Music, the Universal Music Group and EMI, he said. He added that many of the independent labels had been asking the company to raise its prices.

“We have been looking for a catalyzing event to do it, and we think introducing this vast, quality catalog from Sony is that event,” Mr. Stein said.

The deal reinforces several shifts in the online music space:

  • The major labels gave up their objections to selling songs in the unprotected MP3 format in 2007.
  • Apple moved to variable pricing in its iTunes store, with older songs for 79 cents and new tracks for $1.29.

The major labels have also been more willing lately to strike more flexible and less expensive deals with start-ups like Imeem that are trying new approaches to online music.

Canadian Copyright Researcher caught copying

May 30th, 2009

edited article from Matt Hartley,Globe and Mail

One of Canada’s most respected research organizations has a black eye after being forced to withdraw three reports on copyright and intellectual property because they contained plagiarized information from a study by a U.S. lobby group funded by the entertainment industry.

The Conference Board of Canada said it recalled the reports Thursday after an internal investigation showed that they relied too heavily on – and included entire paragraphs lifted from – a document produced by the International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), an American entertainment lobby group.

Both the IIPA and Conference Board reports were critical of Canada’s failure to update its copyright legislation and ratify international intellectual property treaties. Both reports proposed the same solutions for the role Internet service providers should play in fighting piracy, and both suggested harsher penalties for anyone found to be operating services that allow free sharing of files.

For advocates of copyright reform, it’s more than a question of plagiarism. The incident raises fresh concerns over the influence the U.S. entertainment lobby has on Canada’s copyright debate, along with the objectivity of Canadian research groups tasked with investigating intellectual property and piracy issues.The IIPA report is the same document the Office of the United States Trade Representative used to create its Special 301 Report on Copyright Protection and Enforcement, which placed Canada on a priority watch list of the worst piracy and copyright infringing nations on the planet this year.

Reports such as the IIPA’s are designed to pressure Canada into copyright reforms that are slanted in favour of the U.S. entertainment industries rather than Canadian consumers.Also this week, University of Ottawa law professor Jeremy De Beer said that the Conference Board commissioned him to research copyright issues in Canada a year ago and that his findings – which were largely excluded from the report – differed greatly from those found in the final product.

Although some media reports suggested that the Conference Board received $15,000 (Canadian) from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation to help produce the report, a spokeswoman for the ministry said that was not the case.

A spokeswoman for the Conference Board said the organization does take public money for some of its research but confirmed that no public money was spent on the recalled reports.

When a DRM stream becomes a DRM-free download

May 26th, 2009

YouTube is restricted towards on-site consumption and free video downloads are not part of the YouTube offering.  Most users are okay with that arrangement, but others would prefer to download a video or extract the music as an audio file.  That is what exactly Farkie offers, at least while it lasts.

After the user enters a YouTube url, Farkie quickly converts the video into a downloadable file - either as a video or audio codec.  T

The site also claims to work on any streaming media site.  Farkie remains in beta, after launching just a few months ago. Let’s see how long it takes for the legal types to close this down.

Danger Mouse releases CD album package with blank CD

May 19th, 2009

edited from Tech Dirt

Danger Mouse is the DJ who got quite a lot of attention a few years back for creating one of the very first mainstream mashups — mixing the Beatle’s The White Album with Jay-Z’s The Black Album to create the rather unique The Grey Album, an offering that gained widespread notoriety through EMI’s cease-and-desist letters to everyone who posted copies of the album, and then to anyone who posted that they were going to participate in the “Grey Tuesday” protest.

Danger Mouse achieved more mainstream success with his Gnarls Barkley project, a collaboration between Danger Mouse and Cee-Lo Green. And now, due to ongoing legal hassles with EMI, Danger Mouse is taking an innovative approach to ensure he releases his latest music project - the next album will be released as album artwork with a blank recordable CD.

The statement from Danger Mouse reads:

Danger Mouse’s new project Dark Night Of The Soul consists of an album length piece of music by Danger Mouse, Sparklehorse and a host of guest vocalists, along with a collection of original David Lynch photography inspired by and based on the music.

The photographs, which provide a visual narrative for the music, are compiled in a limited edition, hand numbered 100+ page book which will now come with a blank, recordable CD-R. All copies will be clearly labeled: ‘For Legal Reasons, enclosed CD-R contains no music. Use it as you will.’

Due to an ongoing dispute with EMI, Danger Mouse is unable to release the recorded music for Dark Night Of The Soul without fear of being sued by EMI.

Danger Mouse remains hugely proud of Dark Night Of The Soul and hopes that people lucky enough to hear the music, by whatever means (my emphasis), are as excited by it as he is.

Currently, there are no authorized sources at all for the music. . . . . .
Meanwhile, the folks at NPR alert us to the fact that they’re hosting a streaming version of the album for anyone who wants to hear it.

Download Decade

May 13th, 2009

The Globe & Mail is running a week-long series of articles, podcasts and video clips on the impact of technology on music:
G&M Website

MTV To Split Ad Revenue With Facebook, Twitter

May 4th, 2009

Faced with falling prime-time ratings and shrinking ad revenues, MTV is hoping that showing live tweets, Facebook updates and even RockYou videos will get teens excited about its latest new show, What You’re Watching With Alexa Chung.

Blending social media with TV content is a logical step for a network whose target audience is the 18-24 set. What’s new is that MTV will share ad revenue with Facebook and Twitter.

What You’re Watching will be a “joint venture” between MTV and the two social networks - Facebook and Twitter will be get compensation in exchange for letting a content provider make use of their platforms.

CNN, Us Weekly and others have all recently plugged into Facebook or Twitter’s streams in the hopes of generating buzz and traffic (and most importantly, ad revenues) - but revenue sharing historically has not been part of the deals.

Canada placed on copyright blacklist

April 30th, 2009

Globe and Mail April 30, 2009 at 3:56 PM EDT

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration added Canada Thursday to a notorious blacklist of countries where Internet piracy flourishes, reflecting a new, tougher line in Washington over the Harper government’s chronic failure to deliver on promises of new copyright laws.

“Canada has never been put on the priority watch list before,” said Stanford McCoy, assistant U.S. trade representative for intellectual property and innovation as he released Washington’s annual report or offenders.

Canada now joins a group of countries designated as being especially lax in protecting intellectual property, including Algeria, China, Russia, Pakistan, Indonesia and Venezuela. No other advanced Western democracy is on the list and Canada is regarded as a lawless hub for bootleg movies, ripped-off software and pirated chips that bypass copyright protections.

“The decision was not an easy one but we believed that high standards are appropriate in Canada,” Mr. McCoy said. It was clear that Washington’s patience with Ottawa’s repeatedly broken promises has run out, perhaps also a reflection of the greater status and power of the digital and entertainment sectors in the era of the net-savvy Obama administration.

‘This administration will protect American innovations and creativity by negotiating and enforcing strong and effective intellectual property protections,’ U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said this week.

“We would like to see them follow through on that commitment,” Mr. McCoy said, referring to a succession of unfulfilled Throne speech promises that new copyright law would be forthcoming.

‘The United States continues to have serious concerns with Canada’s failure to accede to and implement the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) Internet treaties which Canada signed in 1997,” the report said.

For years, the powerful International Intellectual Property Alliance – a group that includes companies such as Microsoft Corp., Apple Inc. and Paramount Pictures Corp. – pressed the previous Bush administration to get tough with what it regarded as Canada’s chronic failure to enforce intellectual property laws. But the Bush administration was content to leave Canada among the larger and less-serious group of offenders on the ordinary watch list.

The alliance cheered Canada’s blacklisting Thursday. “We commend [the U.S. Trade Representative] for the decision to elevate Canada to the priority watch list,” it said. “Canada remains woefully behind the rest of the developed world (and many countries in the developing world as well) in adopting critical legislation that will facilitate the development of a healthy online marketplace for copyright materials,” said Eric Smith, an alliance spokesman.

“More than a decade has passed since the global community agreed to two international treaties providing minimum standards for protecting copyright in the digital age, but Canada has yet to join these treaties or to implement their obligations in domestic law.”

This week, Trade Minister Stockwell Day warned that the blacklist was coming.

Whether U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk gave Mr. Day a last chance to stay off the list remains unclear.

“They talked about the situation but I can’t say that there were any particular commitments,” Mr. McCoy said Thursday.

President Barack Obama has signalled he intends to take a much harder stance with offenders who are lax about Internet piracy and fail to protect copyright.

“In the President’s trade policy agenda, we noted that this administration will protect American innovations and creativity by negotiating and enforcing strong and effective intellectual property protections,” Mr. Kirk said this week.

Washington also wants Canada to put an end to the flow of pirated and counterfeit movies and DVDs that cross its porous borders. In particular, Washington wants Canadian customs officers to be given the authority to seize pirated materials rather than have to seek a court order each time they suspect a shipment. The flow of pirated and counterfeit material not only enters Canada from abroad but much of it winds up crossing into the United States.

“Canada’s weak border measures continue to be a serious concern for intellectual property owners,” said the annual report issued Thursday by the U.S. Trade Representative.

Canada was singled out and is “being elevated to the priority watch list for the first time, reflecting increasing concern about the continuing need for copyright reform as well as continuing concern about weak border enforcement,” the report said.

Mr. Kirk said “even our closest allies and neighbours such as Canada” must understand that failure to protect intellectual property poses a threat to “one of America’s great strengths in the global economy, our innovation and creativity.”

Thursday’s blacklisting over Canada’s lax copyright laws is only the latest shot in a swelling trans-border crossfire.

It was all quiet on the trade front when the year began, but the arrival of President Barrack Obama changed that. The new president’s “Buy America” restrictions in his country’s massive stimulus package sent shudders through Canadian manufacturers, the long-dormant softwood lumber dispute has been rekindled and then Ottawa announced it was hauling the United States off to the World Trade Organization in a nasty spat over new food labelling requirements that could throttle Canada’s hog and cattle exports.

Susan Boyle: Millions of views, no ad revenue

April 22nd, 2009

Susan Boyle has scored more than 100 million video views on YouTube for the various versions of her “Britain’s Got Talent,  but none of that action is being monetized.  The Boyle clip is not accompanied by ads and not paying out key stakeholders like show producer Fremantle.

Estimates of foregone payouts range from $100,000 to $500,000, based on a CPM range of $1 to $5.

The non-monetization is not a YouTube oversight (see earlier blog entry on YouTube’s money-losing ways).  A “Britain’s Got Talent” channel does not exist, and therefore, neither does an advertising revenue stream.  That contrasts with content creators like Universal Music Group (UMG) and the National Basketball Association (NBA), both of whom have popular, well-established channels that monetize uploaded content.

If a Lebron James basketball shot is posted, the NBA makes money from that - they upload the copy and surround it with ads, and demand the removal of duplicate versions of the video so that any ad revenue accrues to them. Ditto with UMG music videos.

Pirate Bay founders found guilty of piracy

April 20th, 2009

A Swedish court has imposed jail terms on the founders of Pirate Bay in a landmark case that is expected to have lasting international ramifications to online file-sharing. A Swedish judge convicted the four men behind Pirate Bay – Frederik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, Peter Sunde and Carl Lundstrom – of aiding thousands of instances of copyright infringement by operating the site, which indexes songs, movies and TV shows for users to download.

Each man was sentenced to a year in jail and together they have been ordered to pay $3.6-million (U.S.) in damages to some of the world’s largest entertainment companies. If the judgment stands, it would mark one of the first instances in the world where operators of a file-sharing site could face prison time. Sunde, one of the four guilty men, has already said that he will refuse to pay.

Now that Sweden, a country that was seen as a haven for copyright pirates, has enforced its laws, Canada needs to step up bring its domestic copyright legislation into alignment with the rest of the world. Canada is the only developed country whose copyright laws are not in alignment with the World Trade Organization, a global body that administers agreements related to copyright use and infringement.

The new copyright law has been on the backburner for years, shelved every time a Canadian federal election comes up (a depressing event which occurs almost as often as in the dysfunctional Italian politcal landscape).

Making a hardcopy magazine with HP’s MagCloud

April 13th, 2009

College students produce a fashion magazine more cheaply and easily using MagCloud, a new self-publishing site from Hewlett-Packard.

NY Times Slideshow

In Switch, Magazines Think About Raising Prices

April 13th, 2009

By STEPHANIE CLIFFORD, New York Times
Published: April 12, 2009

Fifty-eight cents.

For that, you could get one-eighth of a Starbucks latte.

It is also what subscribers paid, on average, for each issue of Time magazine last year. This is the Time magazine that sends foreign correspondents into Zimbabwe, assigns photographers to capture the war in Afghanistan, and fact-checks and edits every word before issues are printed. And that is before its costs for ink, paper and postage.

Time is in good company — most big magazines’ subscriptions cost on average little more than a dollar an issue. But now, as they consider the decline in advertising and the success of magazines that have increased prices recently, some publishers are wondering whether they can raise their prices without losing subscribers.

rest of article